Sell a $6 million estate in the Bird Streets this year and the city takes $240,000 off the top before you see a dime. Sell the same house, with the same view of the same reservoir, from a lot two ridgelines over in Beverly Hills, and that $240,000 stays in your pocket. Same market. Same buyers. Same brokers competing for the listing. Different tax bill entirely, and the difference has nothing to do with the house.
That is the part of Measure ULA that gets lost in the general coverage of Los Angeles's mansion tax. Most explainers treat it as a citywide rule with a citywide effect. In the Hollywood Hills, it is closer to a line drawn through the neighborhood itself. The hills sit entirely inside the City of Los Angeles. Beverly Hills and West Hollywood, the two cities most people mentally file under "Hollywood Hills adjacent," are their own incorporated municipalities with their own tax rules. That distinction, which has nothing to do with architecture, view corridors, or lot size, is what decides whether a seller writes a six or seven figure check at closing.
Measure ULA is a documentary transfer tax that Los Angeles voters approved in November 2022 and that took effect on April 1, 2023. It applies to real property sales inside the City of Los Angeles above set price thresholds, at rates of 4 percent and 5.5 percent depending on the sale price. The Hollywood Hills, in its entirety, sits inside those city limits. Beverly Hills and West Hollywood do not. Both are separately incorporated cities that set their own transfer tax policy, and neither has adopted anything close to ULA's rates.
That means a seller listing a home on the Beverly Hills side of Coldwater Canyon Drive is working under different rules than a seller one street over on the Los Angeles side, even though both addresses might carry a 90210 or 90069 zip code and both might be marketed as Hollywood Hills adjacent. Zip codes are a postal convenience. They are not tax jurisdictions. The Los Angeles Office of Finance draws the line at the actual city boundary, and that boundary runs through terrain that looks identical on either side of it.
The thresholds are not fixed. They adjust every July 1 based on the Chained Consumer Price Index, and they moved again this year. For sales that closed before July 1, 2026, the thresholds were $5.3 million and $10.6 million. For anything closing after that date, the current fiscal year's thresholds are $5.4 million and $10.9 million.
Here is what that means in dollar terms for a Hollywood Hills seller:
| Sale price | Tax rate | ULA tax owed |
|---|---|---|
| $5.4 million | 4% | roughly $216,000 |
| $6 million | 4% | $240,000 |
| $10.9 million | 5.5% | roughly $599,500 |
| $12 million | 5.5% | $660,000 |
That is on top of the existing city and county documentary transfer taxes, which run a combined 0.56 percent regardless of ULA. None of it applies if the closing happens in Beverly Hills or West Hollywood instead.
The detail that catches long-term owners off guard is that ULA is calculated on the full sale price, not on the gain. A homeowner who bought a Hollywood Hills property decades ago for $2 million and sells it today for $12 million owes the tax on the entire $12 million, not on the $10 million of appreciation. The tax does not care what you paid, what you spent on the remodel, or what your basis is for capital gains purposes. It cares what the buyer wired at closing.
This also rules out one of the more common workarounds sellers ask about. A 1031 exchange defers federal capital gains tax by rolling proceeds into a replacement property. It has no effect on ULA, because ULA is a transfer tax, not an income tax. A seller who structures a flawless exchange to defer everything the IRS would otherwise collect still owes the city its 4 or 5.5 percent at the closing table.
Most Hollywood Hills transactions never come close to the threshold. Neighborhood-level value data from earlier this year put the typical Hollywood Hills sale somewhere in the $1.7 million to $2.1 million range, well under $5.4 million. The tax is not a Hollywood Hills problem in general. It is a specific-address problem, concentrated almost entirely in the estate tier: the Bird Streets, Sunset Plaza, and the handful of architectural trophies that regularly clear $6 million to $20 million and up. A buyer or seller working the lower-priced flats near Cahuenga Pass will likely never think about ULA at all. A buyer or seller working Thrasher Avenue or Oriole Drive thinks about almost nothing else.
That concentration matters for a reason beyond the individual seller's math. When the tax was new, most of its revenue came from commercial and multifamily deals, the office towers and apartment buildings the campaign actually ran on. More recent reporting on the tax's three-year revenue history shows that balance has shifted, with single-family sales now accounting for more than half of the over $1.2 billion the tax had raised since 2023 as of May 2026. A tax sold to voters as a levy on institutional real estate has increasingly become a levy on houses, and the Hollywood Hills estate market is one of the places carrying that weight.
Every seller doing this math right now is doing it against a deadline that has nothing to do with escrow. On May 3, 2026, the California Secretary of State certified the Local Taxpayer Protection Act, a statewide initiative backed by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, for the November 3, 2026 ballot. If voters approve it, local transfer taxes across California would be capped at 0.05 percent of sale price, a small fraction of ULA's current rates. Measure ULA would effectively be gutted the moment the result is certified.
That outcome is not settled. A Public Policy Institute of California poll found a majority of likely voters, including a majority of Republicans, opposed the measure once they were shown the actual ballot title. The vote is genuinely contested, not a formality.
There has also been a parallel effort inside City Hall. Councilmember Nithya Raman introduced a local reform package earlier this year that would have exempted new construction from ULA and added hardship relief for owners affected by the 2025 Palisades fire. The City Council declined to place it on the June 2026 ballot and instead referred the question to an Ad Hoc Committee now chaired by Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, which was still developing recommendations as of this summer. Outside of a narrow, still-under-review carve-out for fire-damaged properties, the tax offers no exemption for an ordinary homeowner. Nonprofit affordable housing developers and government entities can qualify. A seller in the Bird Streets cannot.
For a seller sitting just above the $5.4 million line, the calendar has become part of the pricing conversation. Some are timing closings deliberately, weighing whether to push a fall sale past November 3 on the chance the tax disappears, or to close now rather than gamble a live statewide vote goes the other way. Neither choice is obviously right. It depends on how close the sale price sits to the threshold, how much certainty the seller needs, and how the buyer's own timeline lines up with an election that could move the numbers on both sides of the table.
What is not in question is that the threshold itself is worth pricing around deliberately, not discovering at the closing statement. A seller listing an $11 million home crosses into the 5.5 percent tier at a materially different number than the tax bill implies at $10.8 million. A net proceeds model built before a listing goes live, one that accounts for where a property sits relative to both thresholds and for how the calendar between now and November plays into timing, is the difference between a plan and a surprise.
Does ULA apply to condos, or just single-family homes? It applies to any qualifying real property sale inside the City of Los Angeles above the threshold, including condos, not just detached houses.
If I inherit a Hollywood Hills property and then sell it, does the tax still apply? The sale itself is still subject to ULA if it closes above the threshold. The tax is triggered by the transfer, not by how the seller originally acquired the property.
Can a sale be structured to close after the November election, contingent on the outcome? Some purchase agreements have started including language that accounts for the possibility, but that is a negotiation between buyer and seller, not a right either side has automatically. It is worth discussing with your agent and your escrow officer well before you are under contract, not after.
If you are weighing a Hollywood Hills sale against this calendar, the pricing and timing conversation is worth having before you list, not after an offer is already on the table. The Xuereb Group works these numbers for Hollywood Hills sellers every week. Schedule a complimentary consultation and we will walk through where your property sits relative to both thresholds and what the next few months could mean for your net proceeds.